Common sense is not common, huh!Common sense is learner, we're not born with it!!
Common sense is not common, huh!Common sense is learner, we're not born with it!!
That’s a difficult read…. but forging ahead thru it…. it actually makes sense… but mostly from a strictly “legal“ sense that Kubota lost the suit. If I understand it correctly, at first, Kubota sought a “summary Judgment” and won…but the “factual” matter of such lawsuits (as opposed to the “applicable liability law” determination…. SHOULD have been heard by a jury and determined by that jury.Here is a link that includes the facts of the case.
KINCAID v. KUBOTA TRACTOR CORPORATION (2020) | FindLaw
That case repeatedly uses the terms “manufacturer, seller, supplier”still ,goes back to section/item #13. seems pretty darn CLEAR to me....
Perhaps what Kubota will now do is put sticker, no PAINT, warning labels in RED ( not yellow ) "That DEATH and/or injury WILL result from using this device in ANY manner"
Taken to the nth degree, if you loan your GMC truck to someone who uses it to pull his trailer, and he doesn't cross his chains, he can sue and WIN against GMC, as they did not tell him to cross the chains !!!
Absolutely with you on that (loaning of equipment). Our society has become so litigious....it warrants careful forethought.That case repeatedly uses the terms “manufacturer, seller, supplier”
Makes Me wonder if I should ever-again loan-out my stuff.
Seems there might two solutions.Perhaps what Kubota will now do is put sticker, no PAINT, warning labels in RED ( not yellow ) "That DEATH and/or injury WILL result from using this device in ANY manner"
re: warning labels.
brings up what i have recently experienced in much of Europe.
much of Europe now require EV (battery and hybrid) vehicles to carry warning labels to identify to other drivers, public parking authorities, condo's/stratas, emergency services, pedestrians, etc... that an EV or hybrid is nearby.
So if an ICE doesn't want to park nearby, or let inside an indoor parkade, etc... electric is easily identifiable.
View attachment 120053
No!...No! ...No! ......Republicans (conservatives) are EVIL !!!But disparagement of the left/liberal is grounds for thread deletion/"vacation"/banning?
With my mishap it was 0% my fault or the employers and I was parked on a public street unloading equipment to work at the house I was in front of/ the job site. The 3rd party driver wasn't paying attention, ignored signs, cones, my bright vest and is held liable but since I was punched in on company time it was related to work related, and the company got docked for a serious accident/high medical bills and I received workers comp benefits. Not 100% right in my book but now the company, workers, comp and myself can individually go after the 3rd party to get reimbursed.This kid was a worker on a job site when this happened - he and another teen were being transported to and from a work area.
It's well known that young people are more likely to be hurt/injured and that proper procedures, policies, and yes even stickers and signage all help prevent injuries.
The article makes no mention of an OSHA payment or a business liability but I assume they would have a role or a payout here as well.
In any case this here is a young man who made a poor decision and is now facing a life in a wheelchair or worse. How many of us have done similar or worse and walked away. I'm glad he has been compensated, this may allow him to live to his normal life expectancy.
From the standpoint of potential liability and potential lawsuits: no.Makes Me wonder if I should ever-again loan-out my stuff.
I use to pull a float for the local animal shelter in holiday parades. Even going 5mph there were enough close calls of trashy parents telling their 8 kids to run out infront of a vehicle to get the last tootsie roll I stopped doing it for liability issues.From the standpoint of potential liability and potential lawsuits: no.
Even if a suit has no merit, fighting and winning is normally very time consuming and extremely expensive.
Not a close call at all on the loaning issue. No.
still ,goes back to section/item #13. seems pretty darn CLEAR to me....
Perhaps what Kubota will now do is put sticker, no PAINT, warning labels in RED ( not yellow ) "That DEATH and/or injury WILL result from using this device in ANY manner"
Taken to the nth degree, if you loan your GMC truck to someone who uses it to pull his trailer, and he doesn't cross his chains, he can sue and WIN against GMC, as they did not tell him to cross the chains !!!
Forums are very nice and seems like everyone has something to offer.......good and bad and people have their way of doing things in different parts of the area but you need to take the advice with a grain of salt or after being on them for awhile you get a feel on who's a good source. I'll be 100% honest I see questions, things rigged together or advice given on here sometimes that can damage a machine or injure a person and it sends chills down my back .It is a good thing that advice given on a forum can't come back on the poster for being bad advice. On 2 automobile forums that I read, if someone gives bad advice, one of the more knowledgeable persons will correct the bad advice and set the record straight. There was one fellow who would read a question, do a quick Google search for an answer, and then post it. More often than not, the advice that he was posting was either incomplete or just wrong. Even after he had been warned a few times that his advice was bad, he continued. He was banned for a week the first time, and the next time he got a lifetime ban.