I am writing to express my profound disappointment regarding the lack of replacement support for the instrument cluster on my 2015 Kubota BX25 tractor.
This is not an obscure or antique machine. It is an approximately eleven-year-old compact tractor built and sold on the understanding that Kubota equipment represents durability, longevity, and long-term serviceability. Those qualities are precisely why many of us choose Kubota products and pay premium prices for them.
Yet I have now discovered that a critical instrument component is effectively unavailable or unsupported, leaving owners in the extraordinary position of either scavenging used parts, attempting electronic repair at component level, or engineering entirely custom replacements simply to keep an otherwise functional tractor operational.
This reflects a deeply troubling modern trend: the quiet abandonment of repairability in favour of disposability.
A compact tractor is not a mobile phone. It is not a fashion item. It is a working machine expected to serve farms, acreages, and rural properties for decades. Many older tractors remain operational precisely because they were designed with maintainability in mind.
Ironically, I am now in the position of removing Kubota’s proprietary electronics and replacing them with individual analog gauges and independent components because they are likely to be more reliable, more understandable, and more repairable than the original integrated system.
That should concern any company that takes pride in engineering.
I appreciate that supply chains and product evolution create challenges, but discontinuing support for essential instrumentation on a relatively modern tractor undermines customer confidence and contributes unnecessarily to waste, frustration, and loss of goodwill.
I would strongly urge Kubota to reconsider its long-term parts support policies for compact tractors and to recognize that many customers purchase these machines precisely because they expect them to remain serviceable far beyond a decade.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Sladen-Dew
British Columbia, Canada
This is not an obscure or antique machine. It is an approximately eleven-year-old compact tractor built and sold on the understanding that Kubota equipment represents durability, longevity, and long-term serviceability. Those qualities are precisely why many of us choose Kubota products and pay premium prices for them.
Yet I have now discovered that a critical instrument component is effectively unavailable or unsupported, leaving owners in the extraordinary position of either scavenging used parts, attempting electronic repair at component level, or engineering entirely custom replacements simply to keep an otherwise functional tractor operational.
This reflects a deeply troubling modern trend: the quiet abandonment of repairability in favour of disposability.
A compact tractor is not a mobile phone. It is not a fashion item. It is a working machine expected to serve farms, acreages, and rural properties for decades. Many older tractors remain operational precisely because they were designed with maintainability in mind.
Ironically, I am now in the position of removing Kubota’s proprietary electronics and replacing them with individual analog gauges and independent components because they are likely to be more reliable, more understandable, and more repairable than the original integrated system.
That should concern any company that takes pride in engineering.
I appreciate that supply chains and product evolution create challenges, but discontinuing support for essential instrumentation on a relatively modern tractor undermines customer confidence and contributes unnecessarily to waste, frustration, and loss of goodwill.
I would strongly urge Kubota to reconsider its long-term parts support policies for compact tractors and to recognize that many customers purchase these machines precisely because they expect them to remain serviceable far beyond a decade.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Sladen-Dew
British Columbia, Canada
Last edited by a moderator: