They say that the kids doing texting have new languages that cuts short the amount of key stokes needed, yet still understandable. Ham radio operators using Morse Code have done this for years, yet how many of us would know what is meant by the numbers 73? (Best wishes)?
There is one butchering of the English language that gets me, even though I know what it means. In reading various posts I have never yet seen a writer use the correct term for saying something is "excessive". I refer to the three 2's. They are : to, too and two. From what I can glean from this there is a new language shortening things so the simple use of "to" would suffice for telling about the "to front wheels on his tractor", etc.. We know what that means, even if spelled wrong. Regardless I cringe every time I see this sort of phrase: " The chain we used was to short" or similar avoiding the word "too".
It won't be 2 long before I read: "the chain we used was 2 short". Or: "I 2 am 2 tired of this shortening of words 2wice".
There is one butchering of the English language that gets me, even though I know what it means. In reading various posts I have never yet seen a writer use the correct term for saying something is "excessive". I refer to the three 2's. They are : to, too and two. From what I can glean from this there is a new language shortening things so the simple use of "to" would suffice for telling about the "to front wheels on his tractor", etc.. We know what that means, even if spelled wrong. Regardless I cringe every time I see this sort of phrase: " The chain we used was to short" or similar avoiding the word "too".
It won't be 2 long before I read: "the chain we used was 2 short". Or: "I 2 am 2 tired of this shortening of words 2wice".