Yes, that is why I posted asking him for the correct case number. This was from a few years ago and he made it look like it was recent. I don't know if that was on purpose or accident. Anyway, the case number given comes up invalid. Also, I cannot find the division he references either. I was going to give him the benefit of doubt and see if he can clarify things. I did not see a reply from him yet.Did anyone else notice that this is his second post and the second time that this person has dragged up an old thread with next-to-useless advice?