I Have a question

skeets

Well-known member

Equipment
BX 2360 /B2601
Oct 2, 2009
15,197
4,365
113
SW Pa
If this becomes to political or out of hand, please remove this post!
Yesterday on the radio I heard that some members of our elected officials have been telling enlisted personal that it is permissible to disobey orders if they feel it is an unjust order. I don't understand how they can say such a thing. For my time in service, you did what you were told to do, no matter how you felt, there were no feelings involved. We took an oath to defend against all enemies foreign and domestic, that was our jobs. I know there are widespread feeling on both sides, so am I confused or what ?
 

PHPaul

Well-known member

Equipment
B2650, Pronovost snow blower, Landpride rotary mower, Howard tiller, box blade
Apr 2, 2015
1,199
1,390
113
Downeast Maine
www.eastovershoe.com
That is sedition on the part of the pols advocating it, for which they should be prosecuted.

As far as the military personnel go, you WILL be court martialed to determine if you were or were not justified in disobeying/ignoring the order. If the court finds you were NOT justified, the rest of your day and a significant portion of the rest of your life will go very badly indeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

hagrid

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
K1600GTL, ZX-14R
Jun 11, 2018
1,040
1,447
113
Pittsburgh
The Nuremberg Trials made it clear that "I was just following orders" was insufficient defense from the noose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

GrumpyFarmer

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
B2650, MX6000, Ford 8N, (BX sold)
Sep 13, 2021
3,176
4,358
113
Ohio
It’s some DBs / AHs trying to ignite some anarchy in yet another area of the culture as a whole where none is needed.

that it continues is a big data point to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

fatjay

Active member

Equipment
Kubota B8200, B7200, ZD21
Nov 12, 2016
323
174
43
Eastern PA, USA
One of the local political morons did it. It is sedition. She should go to jail on that alone, let alone the other things she has said.

They're trying to destroy our country. Our military is #1 for a reason, we operate as one with one mission. As soon as everyone starts to think that orders are optional and they can do what they want, things will fall quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Steve67

Active member

Equipment
B2601-fel, 60"mmm, 5' rear blade, balast box
Jan 20, 2017
354
139
43
St. Louis, mo.
Like you I’m a Vietnam vet and I think you would agree My Lai should not have happened, even though we can understand the mental stress of combat in that fking situation
 

chim

Well-known member

Equipment
L4240HSTC with FEL, Ford 1210
Jan 19, 2013
2,817
2,226
113
Near Lancaster, PA, USA
There were orders given to soldiers almost a century ago that involved terrible atrocities. In that case not following orders would have been the best thing to do. Other than something like that.......................
 

armylifer

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
BX1860, FEL, RCK54P MMM, BB1548 Box Scraper, Quick Hitch, Piranha Bar, BX6315
Mar 26, 2013
2,226
984
113
Thurston County, WA
Disobeying an unlawful order is the right thing to do, morally. However, who decides what is lawful? The answer is; we the people decide what is lawful. We do that on election day. The President was lawfully chosen by the people to be the Commander In Chief. The constitution of The Untied States Of America gives him that authority, plain and simple. That has been reinforced several times by The Supreme Court Of The United States. If one chooses to disobey an order, they had better be very certain that it was not a lawful order.

No one person has the right to decide what a lawful order is. One can object to an order for several reasons, but one person does not have the right to decide what is lawful. The oath taken voluntarily by each service member states that he/she will obey the orders of those officers appointed over him/her. It is possible for an officer to give an unlawful order, but that is a very narrow scope of action. If one decides to disobey an order that they deem unlawful, they must defend their decision in a military court, mostly by way of a Courts Martial. Take note of what I said; one must defend their decision because the law presumes that military orders are lawful, and stem from the authority of The Commander In Chief.

I took that oath each time I enlisted and re-enlisted in the US Army. I never took that oath for granted and I did not take it lightly. I knew what I was pledging and did it willingly and with forethought and prayer.

May God bless our Country and those leaders duly elected to serve. Amen
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Henro

Well-known member

Equipment
B2910, BX2200, KX41-2V mini Ex.
May 24, 2019
6,023
3,268
113
North of Pittsburgh PA
My understanding is that the individuals that voiced that thought were all military veterans that are serving in government. They stated military personnel should NOT obey ILLEGAL ORDERS.

I don't believe feelings played any part in their statement. I could be wrong...but promoting blind following of illegal orders does not seem like the American way to me.
 

fatjay

Active member

Equipment
Kubota B8200, B7200, ZD21
Nov 12, 2016
323
174
43
Eastern PA, USA
There's also protests claiming what ICE is doing is illegal. It's a mind game. You don't have to follow illegal orders, followed immediately by your order is illegal. Despite there being nothing illegal about it.
 

Mark_BX25D

Well-known member

Equipment
Bx25D
Jul 19, 2020
1,898
1,376
113
Virginia
It is not sedition to remind soldiers that they have a moral AND a legal OBLIGATION to disobey unlawful orders, such as gunning down unarmed civilians.

However, the individual who made the noise about it was pressed on what unlawful orders have been given, and could not come up with any.

It was political grandstanding, and nothing more.

I note that when I served, my oath stated that I swore to obey all LAWFUL orders. I understand that word, "lawful" has been removed from the oath.

That should trouble all of us.
 

jaxs

Well-known member

Equipment
B1750HST
Jun 22, 2023
982
761
93
Texas
The same people telling soldiers they should disobey orders are telling illegals they have a connotational right to disobey orders from soldiers and law enforcement. I'd say their goal is to cause clashes for news media to ramp up on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Orangeglow

Active member

Equipment
2015 BX2370
Jun 19, 2014
362
182
43
Prescott, Ontario
From what I have seen, and continue to see is, a lot of regret from military survivers that finally realize they were duped into thinking they were fighting for a certain cause, only to realize much later once retired that the end game was a hoax and that they had put their life on the line for some other agenda. Also, the treatment of all the vets is absolutely terrible and a disgrace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Henro

Well-known member

Equipment
B2910, BX2200, KX41-2V mini Ex.
May 24, 2019
6,023
3,268
113
North of Pittsburgh PA
Why should we even be discussing whether military personnel should (or should not) obey unlawful (illegal) orders? Seems like a “no brainer.”

Amazes me actually. How did we ever get to this point?
 

Scm

Active member

Equipment
BX23S
Sep 28, 2024
175
162
43
Missouri
From what I have seen, and continue to see is, a lot of regret from military survivers that finally realize they were duped into thinking they were fighting for a certain cause, only to realize much later once retired that the end game was a hoax and that they had put their life on the line for some other agenda. Also, the treatment of all the vets is absolutely terrible and a disgrace.
17.7 a day off themselves. I wonder how many are because of the first problem you mention.