SlickShift
New member
Equipment
B3030, LA403, BH77, RC72-30B; IH1000 Sickle Mower; BushHog SBX60, 25-06;
Greetings all,
I now have a BH77 backhoe with the factory mechanical thumb. Like many on here, I'd like to convert it to a hydraulic thumb. I have read all of the posts I can find on this topic. I understand that many people use a solenoid & diverter valve to electrically re-route hydraulic pressure to actuate the thumb cylinder. I would prefer not to do that. Looking at the service manual (and the BH92 Hydraulic Thumb Kit details), it seems as though the easiest way to add hydraulic thumb control would be to add another Kubota valve to the control stack, just like the BH92 kit does. I looked, and unfortunately Kubota charges over $2000 for just ONE of the valves in the stack after you buy the pressure relief cartridges too. Or you can buy the whole stack for over $4 grand. But that's approaching what I paid for the entire backhoe.
My next thought is to tee into the P & T ports feeding the control valve body. (Should be the two lines shown in the left of the picture.) Then I can add a foot pedal (akin to the Walvoil SVM502-01B2) on the right floorboard of the backhoe. Then of course run the lines from the foot valve up the boom and to the thumb cylinder.
As others have mentioned, a pressure relief crossover could be easily added in this circuit to prevent blowing out the thumb cylinder.
The advantages are multiple:
1. With the pedal, the thumb should work at the same time as all the other controls, though the more you actuate, the slower they will be.
2. The only connections you'd have to make when removing and installing the backhoe are the same two hydraulic lines you always have to.
3. You don't have to tie in to your tractor's electrical system at all.
Has anyone tried anything like this? Can anyone think of any reason why this wouldn't work? Anyone who has installed a thumb cylinder, which one (brand & part number) did you use? Are you happy with it?
I'm planning to do this sometime this spring. If it goes well, I think the same approach is valid for adding the 3rd function on the front end loader (on the left side). Only in that case, I will have to add two more hydraulic couplings on that side in order to remove the loader.
I now have a BH77 backhoe with the factory mechanical thumb. Like many on here, I'd like to convert it to a hydraulic thumb. I have read all of the posts I can find on this topic. I understand that many people use a solenoid & diverter valve to electrically re-route hydraulic pressure to actuate the thumb cylinder. I would prefer not to do that. Looking at the service manual (and the BH92 Hydraulic Thumb Kit details), it seems as though the easiest way to add hydraulic thumb control would be to add another Kubota valve to the control stack, just like the BH92 kit does. I looked, and unfortunately Kubota charges over $2000 for just ONE of the valves in the stack after you buy the pressure relief cartridges too. Or you can buy the whole stack for over $4 grand. But that's approaching what I paid for the entire backhoe.
My next thought is to tee into the P & T ports feeding the control valve body. (Should be the two lines shown in the left of the picture.) Then I can add a foot pedal (akin to the Walvoil SVM502-01B2) on the right floorboard of the backhoe. Then of course run the lines from the foot valve up the boom and to the thumb cylinder.
As others have mentioned, a pressure relief crossover could be easily added in this circuit to prevent blowing out the thumb cylinder.
The advantages are multiple:
1. With the pedal, the thumb should work at the same time as all the other controls, though the more you actuate, the slower they will be.
2. The only connections you'd have to make when removing and installing the backhoe are the same two hydraulic lines you always have to.
3. You don't have to tie in to your tractor's electrical system at all.
Has anyone tried anything like this? Can anyone think of any reason why this wouldn't work? Anyone who has installed a thumb cylinder, which one (brand & part number) did you use? Are you happy with it?
I'm planning to do this sometime this spring. If it goes well, I think the same approach is valid for adding the 3rd function on the front end loader (on the left side). Only in that case, I will have to add two more hydraulic couplings on that side in order to remove the loader.
Attachments
-
346.7 KB Views: 179